Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
>>
>> My approach is to have one for mount points and ramfs/tmpfs/sysfs/etc.
>> which are pinned for their entire lifetime and another for regular
>> files/inodes. One could take a three-way approach and have
>> always-pinned, often-pinned and rarely-pinned.
>>
>> We won't get never-pinned that way.
>
> That sounds pretty good. The problem, of course, is that most of the time,
> the actual dentry allocation itself is done before you really know which
> case the dentry will be in, and the natural place for actually giving the
> dentry lifetime hint is *not* at "d_alloc()", but when we "instantiate"
> it with d_add() or d_instantiate().
>
> But it turns out that most of the filesystems we care about already use a
> special case of "d_add()" that *already* replaces the dentry with another
> one in some cases: "d_splice_alias()".
>
> So I bet that if we just taught "d_splice_alias()" to look at the inode,
> and based on the inode just re-allocate the dentry to some other slab
> cache, we'd already handle a lot of the cases!
>
> And yes, you'd end up with the reallocation overhead quite often, but at
> least it would now happen only when filling in a dentry, not in the
> (*much* more critical) cached lookup path.
>
> Linus
You would only get it for dentries that live long (or your prediction
is awfully wrong) and then the reallocation amortizes over time if you
will. :)
MfG
Goswin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
