Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> > > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
> >
> > Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable, but still
> > visible, a select is usually involved.
>
> On i86_64 (but I think the arch does not matter).
> make defconfig
> make menuconfig
>
> At top-level menu I see:
> --- Enable the block layer --->
>
> In block/Kconfig we have:
> menuconfig BLOCK
> bool "Enable the block layer" if EMBEDDED
> default y
>
> If EMBEDDED == n then we see the above.
> And this was my first experience with this patch - and it
> took me some thoughts to realise it was the "if EMBEDDED" part
> that made it look like -*-
Indeed, I forgot about this case. Here it's actually the menu entry of a
symbol that is forced to be visible, because a child entry is visible.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
