Re: [PATCH v3] menuconfig: distinguish between selected-by-another options and comments

[Matej Laitl <strohel@gmail.com>]

On Sunday 16 of September 2007 19:59:56 Roman Zippel wrote:
> Right now I prefer the previous version.

The v2 was maybe more intuitive, but had at least one flaw, where it claimed
the option was selected by another, while it was in fact only made
unchangeable by 'bool "Enable block layer" if EMBEDDED', defaulting to y.

> This maximum value is overridden  
> by the minimum value, so I wouldn't like it to be exported like this.

Where exactly does this happen? There are cases when maximum < minimum, for
example when you <M> THINKPAD_ACPI, then <N> BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT. After that,
BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE has minimum of 1 (selected by THINKPAD_ACPI) and maximum
0 (depends on BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT, which is n)

The function names are maybe suboptimal, I agree.

> I would really like to see an example, where the new changes make a 
> difference.

Try saying <M> to MAC80211, wireless extensions were -*- with v2, now are (*) with v3.
Also the symbols ( ), { } are changed and more well-defined in v3 IMHO.

Regards,
         Matěj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/