Rusty Russell wrote:
> Well, containerization deserves its own menu, but the question is does i
> it belong under this menu?
No, I don't think so. While there are some broad similarities in
effect, the technology is completely different, as are the capabilities
and tradeoffs. They're pretty much orthogonal.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Normalize config options for guest support
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- From: "Alexey Eremenko" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] Normalize config options for guest support
- Prev by Date: Re: Statement by SFLC (was Re: Wasting our Freedom)
- Next by Date: Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu
- Index(es):
 |