Re: x86 merge - a little feedback

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:14:22 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

> People do not expect code under arch/i386/ to be used by code under 
> arch/x86_64/ and vice versa.

[OT: it drives me batshit that we ended up including stuff in both directions]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: include/linux/mutex.h file is unclear about software interrupts and mutex_trylock
• Next by Date: Re: Can LVM block I/O and hang a system?
• Previous by thread: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
• Next by thread: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]