Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM
paravirtualizations on other hypervisors.  However, I don't think this
is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just
use leaf 0.  I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch.

Hm.  Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible
hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if
the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm
one.  Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something?

Yeah, that works with me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

    J


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux