Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.

 > Maybe you should automatically create an alias each time new interface
 > is added so that admin would not care about proper aliases?

I agree that makes much more sense from a user interface point of
view.  Unfortunately an alias without an address doesn't make sense,
so there doesn't seem to be a way to implement that.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
    • From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: EDD still failing on some systems with 2.6.23-rc6-git2
• Next by Date: Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]