Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.

 > Maybe you should automatically create an alias each time new interface
 > is added so that admin would not care about proper aliases?

I agree that makes much more sense from a user interface point of
view.  Unfortunately an alias without an address doesn't make sense,
so there doesn't seem to be a way to implement that.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
  - From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: EDD still failing on some systems with 2.6.23-rc6-git2
Next by Date: Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]