Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
It is NOT the PSU, nor is it cables, as all the drives work well using the same cables + PSU (in the same box) if I connect them to my other two controllers (in that same box).
It's sometimes the combination that matters most. You cannot really make that determination yet.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- References:
- sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
- Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] v4l: fix build error for et61x251 driver
- Next by Date: Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading
- Previous by thread: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- Next by thread: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- Index(es):
![]() |