On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:50:22 +0200 (CEST)
Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > This is ridiculous, I asked you multiple times to explain to me
> > > some of the differences relative to CFS as response to the splitup
> > > requests. Not once did you react, you didn't even ask what I'd
> > > like to know specifically.
> >
> > Roman,
> >
> > this is... a strange comment. It almost sounds like you were holding
> > the splitup hostage depending on some other thing happening....
> > that's not a good attitude in my book. Having big-blob patches that
> > do many things at the same time leads to them being impossible to
> > apply. Linux works by having smaller incrementals. You know that;
> > you've been around for a long time.
>
> There is actually a very simple reason for that, the actual patch is
> not my primary focus,
for someone who's not focused on patches/code, you make quite a bit of
noise when someone does turn your discussion into smaller patches and
only credits you three times.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
