On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:04 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > AFAICT the compensation part is already done by the scaling part, without > the load part it largely mirrors what __update_stats_wait_end() does, i.e. > it gets the same time as other tasks, which have been on the rq. All it tried to do was approximate the situation where the task never left the rq. I'm not saying it makes sense or is the right thing to do, just what the thought behind that particular bit was. There is a reason it was turned off by default: - SCHED_FEAT_SLEEPER_AVG *0 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds
- Previous by thread: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- Next by thread: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- Index(es):
 |