Re: [PATCH] Fix race with shared tag queue maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 13 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > My bad, I think I added the smp_mb__before_clear_bit() when it was
> > __test_and_set_bit() like in the first hunk.
> 
> Ahh, that wouldn't work at all. The "__test_and_set_bit()" thing isn't 
> atomic at all, and no amount of memory barriers around it would help 
> (you'd need to use real locking, but at that point the memory barriers are 
> pointless anyway).

Hence the change, it looks like an oversight from when we didn't allow
sharing of tag maps (then the queue lock provided adequate protection).

> > +	/*
> > +	 * Ensure ordering between ->tag_index[tag] clear and tag clear
> > +	 */
> > +	smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> 
> You still left this one. But never mind - I already edited your original 
> patch and it's in my tree with both of those things removed.

I took at look at the committed patch and it looks fine, thanks Linus.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux