On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> E.g. when looking at the reverse dependencies of libhal, it would not be
> funny if kernel 2.6.43 required a more recent version of HAL.
Adrian, what's the point of answering your questions, WHEN YOU DON'T EVEN
READ THE ANSWERS!
So stop repeating your inane question, and instead LISTEN to what people
are saying.
There is *no* requirement what-so-ever on user space. End of story.
If user-space doesn't tell devices to go to autosuspend, they just won't
do so. But this has nothing to do with white-lists, black-lists, 2.6.43,
or your HAL version.
That black-listing was a mistake. We got over it. Now PLEASE you get over
it too!
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
