On 9/12/07, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Change the names of 'uid' and 'gid' parameters to the more appropriate
> 'dfltuid' and 'dfltgid'.
>
...
> strcpy(v9ses->name, V9FS_DEFUSER);
> strcpy(v9ses->remotename, V9FS_DEFANAME);
> + v9ses->dfltuid = V9FS_DEFUID;
> + v9ses->dfltgid = V9FS_DEFGID;
>
...
> +#define V9FS_DEFUID (0)
> +#define V9FS_DEFGID (0)
I'm not sure if there is a good solution here, but I'm uncomfortable
with using uid=0 as the default. I'm not sure if there is a default
uid for nobody, but anything is probably better than 0. Looks like
nfsnobody is 65534, we could use that - even if only as a marker for
the server to map it to nobody on the target system? What do you
think?
Particularly with attach-per-user, we probably need to look at
interacting with idmapd or create our own variant real soon.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
