Re: hci_sock.c build failure

Hello,

I'm wondering why the build failure wasn't fixed by a patch like this:


diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index 5ccea5f..85416bb 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ static inline void hci_sock_cmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct sk_

                skb_get_timestamp(skb, &tv);

-               data = &tv;
-               len = sizeof(tv);
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
                if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
                        struct compat_timeval ctv;
@@ -358,6 +356,9 @@ static inline void hci_sock_cmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct sk_
                        data = &ctv;
                        len = sizeof(ctv);
                }
+#else
+               data = &tv;
+               len = sizeof(tv);
 #endif

                put_cmsg(msg, SOL_HCI, HCI_CMSG_TSTAMP, len, data);


-- 
MfG/Sincerely

Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: hci_sock.c build failure
    • From: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: O_NOLINK for open()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)
• Previous by thread: Re: hci_sock.c build failure
• Next by thread: Re: hci_sock.c build failure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]