On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:03:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I suspect the fix we want is: > ack. The trend seems to be to avoid this redundant check in the interrupt handler. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [CORRECTION][PATCH] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in uli526x_interrupt() in drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
- From: Micah Gruber <[email protected]>
- Re: [CORRECTION][PATCH] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in uli526x_interrupt() in drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [CORRECTION][PATCH] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in uli526x_interrupt() in drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
- Prev by Date: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
- Next by Date: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
- Previous by thread: Re: [CORRECTION][PATCH] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in uli526x_interrupt() in drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
- Next by thread: Re: [CORRECTION][PATCH] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in uli526x_interrupt() in drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
- Index(es):
 |