On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
> >
> > I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
> > of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
> > embedded platform? not the kind which runs applications that use mbind),
>
> sorry, i dont quite follow ... you're saying it does or doesnt make
> sense to have NUMA syscalls on a no-mmu platform ? my [limited]
> understanding of NUMA is that it, by definition, requires a MMU in
> order to shunt pages around
>
I think Matt means mbind can be ignored because it is for NUMA.
> > but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> > to be implemented for no-mmu?
>
> you're right we want mremap, my fault
>
Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
mm/nommu.c. How do think of this, Bernd?
> > I think you'll want the *robust_list syscalls too.
>
> lack of man pages on these made be lazy and dump em into the mmu pile
> when in reality they have nothing to do with it ... we do want these
>
No man pages for this fancy syscalls. I found some info here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e9056f13bfcdd054a0c3d730e4e096748d8a363a
I am not sure for these. Need some investigation.
> > > +#define __IGNORE_swapon
> > > +#define __IGNORE_swapoff
>
> a no brainer -- not usable on no-mmu
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_msync
> > > +#define __IGNORE_remap_file_pages
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mlock
> > > +#define __IGNORE_munlock
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mlockall
> > > +#define __IGNORE_munlockall
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mincore
> > > +#define __IGNORE_madvise
>
> implementation only exists for mmu
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mbind
> > > +#define __IGNORE_get_mempolicy
> > > +#define __IGNORE_set_mempolicy
> > > +#define __IGNORE_migrate_pages
> > > +#define __IGNORE_move_pages
>
> NUMA only
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mremap
> > > +#define __IGNORE_set_robust_list
> > > +#define __IGNORE_get_robust_list
>
> we want these
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_getcpu
>
> useful only with SMP so i guess we should do it
also the brand new syscall fallocate should be added as Paul said:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=97ac73506c0ba93f30239bb57b4cfc5d73e68a62
Thanks a lot
-Bryan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]