On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:27:33AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > IOWs, we already play these vmap harm-minimisation games in the places
> > where we can, but still the overhead is high and something we'd prefer
> > to be able to avoid.
>
> I don't think you've looked nearly far enough with all this low hanging
> fruit.
Ok, so we need to hack the vm to optimise it further. When it comes to
TLB flush code and optimising that sort of stuff, I'm out of my depth.
> I just gave 4 things which combined might easily reduce xfs vmap overhead
> by several orders of magnitude, all without changing much code at all.
Patches would be greatly appreciately. You obviously understand this
vm code much better than I do, so if it's easy to fix by adding some
generic vmap cache thingy, please do.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
