RFC: bug in load_elf_binary?

["Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>]

No responses in a couple days so I'm resending.  I've CC'd a few people 
who've touched binfmt_elf.c recently.

We've got an unusual elf binary and we seem to be running into a bug in 
the elf loader.  I'm not an elf expert, so my apologies if I get the 
terminology wrong.
The elf spec says that PT_LOAD segments must be ordered by vaddr.  We 
want to have a segment at a relatively low fixed vaddr.  The exact 
address is not important, except that it's lower than the standard elf 
headers and so it must be the first segment in the elf file.
However, this segment also has no size in the file...it's basically all 
statically allocated at runtime.
In the kernel elf loader, the p_vaddr and p_offset of the first segment 
are used to determine the load_addr for use with the rest of the 
segments.  In the case of this elf file, the first segment does not 
actually have a valid p_offset.
Anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with this?  One crude hack we 
considered was to simply not set the load_addr if the first segment 
doesn't have a valid p_offset, but that doesn't solve the general case.
Thanks,

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/