It makes sense to stop the SPU processes as soon as possible. Also if we
dont acquire_saved() I think there's a possibility that the value in
csa.priv2.spu_lslr_RW won't be accurate.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
index 6663669..21283f6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ static int spufs_arch_notes_size(void)
fd = 0;
while ((ctx = coredump_next_context(&fd)) != NULL) {
+ spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
rc = spufs_ctx_note_size(ctx, fd);
+ spu_release_saved(ctx);
if (rc < 0)
break;
--
1.5.1.3.g7a33b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]