Re: x86 merge - a little feedback

> 
> As an example, visws.c is as much non-64bit as it is pre-i686.
Bad example...
visws is a visws specific file that should naver have allowed
anywhere outside mach-visws.
Any link-order issues should have been dealt with in other ways.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux
• Next by Date: Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)
• Previous by thread: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
• Next by thread: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]