On Tue, 11 September 2007 13:07:06 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> You may want to consider Mel's antifrag approaches which certainly
> decreases the chance of this occurring. Reclaim can open up the needed
> linear memory hole in a intentional way. The memory compaction approach
> can even move pages to open up these 2M holes. The more pages we make
> movable (see f.e. the targeted slab reclaim patchset that makes slab
> pages movable) the more reliable higher order allocations become.
I absolutely agree with your slab reclaim patchset. No argument here.
What I'm starting to wonder about is where your approach has advantages
over Andrea's. The chances of triggering something vaguely similar to
Nick's worst case scenario are certainly higher for your solution. So
unless there are other upsides it is just the second-best solution.
Jörn
--
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
-- Albert Einstein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
