* Vivek Goyal <[email protected]> [2007-09-11 07:14]:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:52:58PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > > ...
> > >
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
> >
> > Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and
> > I also wondered why, but I didn't change this because maybe there's
> > some reason I don't know.
> >
> > Vivek, do you know why this was CONFIG_KEXEC?
>
> As Eric mentioned, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP has been used for all dump capturing
> infrastructure and rest of the kexec and kexec on panic functionality
> has been put under CONFIG_KEXEC.
>
> Keeping memory reservation under CONFIG_KEXEC helps in a sense when
> somebody is not using a relocatable kernel and uses a custom kernel for dump
> capture. In that case he does not have to enable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP in the
> first kernel.
Yes, you all are right ... sorry for the noise ;)
Thanks,
Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
