Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 13:41 +0530, suzuki wrote:
Hi
I have been trying to debug this issue from my side and could find the
following.
The pathconf() request gets a reply with :
pathinfo.max_namelen = (unsiged int) -1
pathinfo.max_link = 255
Is this really an expected answer from a server for a proper connection
( for mount requests on an exported dir) ? Is there something that needs
to be fixed at server side ?
I assume that this is with my patch applied?
No. This is without your patch. So I am trying to debug why the server
is sending a -1 ! (which sounds like an error ?)
Thanks
Suzuki K P
IBM Linux Technology Centre
Yes: as long as the kernel
sets NAME_MAX to 255, then the above is expected behaviour.
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
