Hi Balbir/Pavel,
As I mentioned to you directly at the kernel summit, I think it might
be cleaner to integrate resource counters more closely with control
groups. So rather than controllers such as the memory controller
having to create their own boilerplate cf_type structures and
read/write functions, it should be possible to just call a function
something like
control_group_add_rescounter(struct cgroup *cg, struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct res_counter *res,
const char *name)
and have it handle all the userspace API. This would simplify the task
of keeping a consistent userspace API between different controllers
using the resource counter abstraction.
Paul
On 8/17/07, Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
>
> Introduce generic structures and routines for resource accounting.
>
> Each resource accounting container is supposed to aggregate it,
> container_subsystem_state and its resource-specific members within.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> include/linux/res_counter.h | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> init/Kconfig | 7 ++
> kernel/Makefile | 1
> kernel/res_counter.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 230 insertions(+)
>
> diff -puN /dev/null include/linux/res_counter.h
> --- /dev/null 2007-06-01 20:42:04.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/include/linux/res_counter.h 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +#ifndef __RES_COUNTER_H__
> +#define __RES_COUNTER_H__
> +
> +/*
> + * Resource Counters
> + * Contain common data types and routines for resource accounting
> + *
> + * Copyright 2007 OpenVZ SWsoft Inc
> + *
> + * Author: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/container.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * The core object. the container that wishes to account for some
> + * resource may include this counter into its structures and use
> + * the helpers described beyond
> + */
> +
> +struct res_counter {
> + /*
> + * the current resource consumption level
> + */
> + unsigned long usage;
> + /*
> + * the limit that usage cannot exceed
> + */
> + unsigned long limit;
> + /*
> + * the number of unsuccessful attempts to consume the resource
> + */
> + unsigned long failcnt;
> + /*
> + * the lock to protect all of the above.
> + * the routines below consider this to be IRQ-safe
> + */
> + spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Helpers to interact with userspace
> + * res_counter_read/_write - put/get the specified fields from the
> + * res_counter struct to/from the user
> + *
> + * @counter: the counter in question
> + * @member: the field to work with (see RES_xxx below)
> + * @buf: the buffer to opeate on,...
> + * @nbytes: its size...
> + * @pos: and the offset.
> + */
> +
> +ssize_t res_counter_read(struct res_counter *counter, int member,
> + const char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *pos);
> +ssize_t res_counter_write(struct res_counter *counter, int member,
> + const char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *pos);
> +
> +/*
> + * the field descriptors. one for each member of res_counter
> + */
> +
> +enum {
> + RES_USAGE,
> + RES_LIMIT,
> + RES_FAILCNT,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * helpers for accounting
> + */
> +
> +void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter);
> +
> +/*
> + * charge - try to consume more resource.
> + *
> + * @counter: the counter
> + * @val: the amount of the resource. each controller defines its own
> + * units, e.g. numbers, bytes, Kbytes, etc
> + *
> + * returns 0 on success and <0 if the counter->usage will exceed the
> + * counter->limit _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
> + */
> +
> +int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
> +int res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
> +
> +/*
> + * uncharge - tell that some portion of the resource is released
> + *
> + * @counter: the counter
> + * @val: the amount of the resource
> + *
> + * these calls check for usage underflow and show a warning on the console
> + * _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
> + */
> +
> +void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
> +void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
> +
> +#endif
> diff -puN init/Kconfig~res_counters_infra init/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/init/Kconfig~res_counters_infra 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/init/Kconfig 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -337,6 +337,13 @@ config CPUSETS
>
> Say N if unsure.
>
> +config RESOURCE_COUNTERS
> + bool "Resource counters"
> + help
> + This option enables controller independent resource accounting
> + infrastructure that works with containers
> + depends on CONTAINERS
> +
> config SYSFS_DEPRECATED
> bool "Create deprecated sysfs files"
> default y
> diff -puN kernel/Makefile~res_counters_infra kernel/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/kernel/Makefile~res_counters_infra 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/kernel/Makefile 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RELAY) += relay.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += utsname_sysctl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT) += delayacct.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TASKSTATS) += taskstats.o tsacct.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS) += res_counter.o
>
> ifneq ($(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER),y)
> # According to Alan Modra <[email protected]>, the -fno-omit-frame-pointer is
> diff -puN /dev/null kernel/res_counter.c
> --- /dev/null 2007-06-01 20:42:04.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/kernel/res_counter.c 2007-08-17 13:14:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> +/*
> + * resource containers
> + *
> + * Copyright 2007 OpenVZ SWsoft Inc
> + *
> + * Author: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/parser.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/res_counter.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
> + counter->limit = (unsigned long)LONG_MAX;
> +}
> +
> +int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + if (counter->usage > (counter->limit - val)) {
> + counter->failcnt++;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + counter->usage += val;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->lock, flags);
> + ret = res_counter_charge_locked(counter, val);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
> + val = counter->usage;
> +
> + counter->usage -= val;
> +}
> +
> +void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->lock, flags);
> + res_counter_uncharge_locked(counter, val);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static inline unsigned long *res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter,
> + int member)
> +{
> + switch (member) {
> + case RES_USAGE:
> + return &counter->usage;
> + case RES_LIMIT:
> + return &counter->limit;
> + case RES_FAILCNT:
> + return &counter->failcnt;
> + };
> +
> + BUG();
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +ssize_t res_counter_read(struct res_counter *counter, int member,
> + const char __user *userbuf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + unsigned long *val;
> + char buf[64], *s;
> +
> + s = buf;
> + val = res_counter_member(counter, member);
> + s += sprintf(s, "%lu\n", *val);
> + return simple_read_from_buffer((void __user *)userbuf, nbytes,
> + pos, buf, s - buf);
> +}
> +
> +ssize_t res_counter_write(struct res_counter *counter, int member,
> + const char __user *userbuf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + char *buf, *end;
> + unsigned long tmp, *val;
> +
> + buf = kmalloc(nbytes + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + if (buf == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + buf[nbytes] = '\0';
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, nbytes))
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + tmp = simple_strtoul(buf, &end, 10);
> + if (*end != '\0')
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + val = res_counter_member(counter, member);
> + *val = tmp;
> + ret = nbytes;
> +out_free:
> + kfree(buf);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> _
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
> Balbir Singh
> Linux Technology Center
> IBM, ISTL
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
