Re: [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups

On Sep 10 2007 13:53, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ enum {
>>  	MEM_CONTAINER_TYPE_CACHED,
>>  	MEM_CONTAINER_TYPE_ALL,
>>  	MEM_CONTAINER_TYPE_MAX,
>> -} mem_control_type;
>> +};
>> 
>
>Not sure about this, is this the preferred style?

Yes, typedefs are bad. And because it happens very so often,
I also have the link: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/21/34



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] unexport sys_{open,read}
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups
Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] mm/memcontrol.c: clenups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]