Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 15:11 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> after upgrading to 2.6.23-rc5 (and applying davem's fix [0]), lockdep 
> was quite noisy when I tried to shape my external (wireless) interface:
> 
> [ 6400.534545] FahCore_78.exe/3552 just changed the state of lock:
> [ 6400.534713]  (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}, at: [<c038d595>] netif_receive_skb+0x2d5/0x3c0
> [ 6400.534941] but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
> [ 6400.535145]  (police_lock){-.--}
> 
> This happened when I executed: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.23-rc5/qos.sh.txt
> (using iproute2-ss070313). The is still running, I just noticed a short 
> hickup, probably when it was busy writing the warning to the disk.
> 
> More details and .config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.23-rc5/

seems unavailable at this time, please submit the whole lockdep report
if possible.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux