Re: [RFC] disable PCIE 'Enable No Snoop' bit by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:40:38AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:57:31 -0600
> 
> > I'm not sure your analysis is correct.  Here's what my draft copy of
> > the pcie 2.0 spec says:
> > 
> >   Enble No Snoop ? If this bit is Set, the Function is permitted to
> >   Set the No Snoop bit in the Requester Attributes of transactions it
> >   initiates that do not require hardware enforced cache coherency (see
> >   Section 2.2.6.5). Note that setting this bit to 1b should not cause
> >   a Function to Set the No Snoop attribute on all transactions that it
> >   initiates. Even when this bit is Set, a Function is only permitted
> >   to Set the No Snoop attribute on a transaction when it can guarantee
> >   that the address of the transaction is not stored in any cache in
> >   the system.  This bit permitted to be hardwired to 0b if a Function
> >   would never Set the No Snoop attribute in transactions it initiates.
> >   Default value of this bit is 1b.
> > 
> > That implies that devices are only allowed to set it when it's safe to
> > do so ... and we don't need to turn it off.
> 
> This is my understanding of this area of PCI-E as well, and I
> also agree that therefore we should not turn this bit off.

I agree.  But Shaohua, do you see any problems that this patch fixes?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux