Re: Platform device id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:35:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Greg, all,
> 
> While platform_device.id is a u32, platform_device_add() handles "-1" as
> a special id value. This has potential for confusion and bugs. One such
> bug was reported to me by David Brownell:
> 
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-September/001787.html
> 
> And since then I've found two other drivers  affected (uartlite and
> i2c-pxa).
> 
> Could we at least make platform_device.id an int so as to clear up the
> confusion? I doubt that the id will ever be a large number anyway.

Sure, that's fine by me, feel free to send a patch.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux