On the day of Friday 07 September 2007 Chuck Ebbert hast written: > On 09/06/2007 07:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]> writes: > >> Some systems lock up without the noapic option. > > > > Please find patterns: cpu type, chipsets, mainboard vendors etc. > > This is the first one I've actually had in front of me: > > HP TX1000 notebook > Nvidia C51/MCP51 mobile chipset Do you have a hpet? If not, have you tried using acpi_use_timer_override with apic? bye, -- (°= =°) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- References:
- Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC)
- Next by Date: Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- Next by thread: Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
- Index(es):
 |