Re: Platform device id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> For that matter, a *driver* should never create its own device node(s)
> in the first place.  Device creation belongs elsewhere, like as part of
> platform setup or, for busses with integral enumeration support like
> PCI or USB, bus glue.  Linux is moving away from that legacy model.

This assumes that we have a better bus than "platform" to dump drivers like
thinkpad-acpi, hdaps, and a host of other host-specific stuff.

> I realize that may be more easily said than done in some cases,
> like i8042 on non-PNP systems.

Yes, and there is a LOT of non-PNP stuff involved, since platform became the
dumping ground for host-specific devices (as opposed to platform-specific
devices).

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux