On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:32:52AM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Sorry. Of course, you have to copy the entire /lib, etc. onto the tmpfs,
> but you get the gist....
>
> The point is that it is easy to subvert userspace if you have enough
> privileges. In the above example it may not be entirely undetectable,
> but who here is running a script on every login to check that / is
> indeed uncompromised?
I suppose this is the motivation for things like the "secure attention
key"?
But I'm most curious actually about to what degree the kernel itself is
vulnerable to root (without a reboot). Is disabling /dev/kmem and
module-loading in theory enough? (Modulo bugs like filesystems that
aren't secure against untrusted filesystems, etc.)
--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
