Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code

[email protected] wrote:

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:37:37 PDT, Randy Dunlap said:

Thanks.  I look forward to the explanation of Reviewed-by, what it
means, and how it differs from Acked-by.

As long as you're at it,  the only tag *I* seem to need is 'Tested-By:' :)

Yep, and that's a good one IMO.

--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/6] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Next by Date: Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]