Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170

On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:36 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Johannes Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hah, I suspected as much but didn't have a chance to look yet. I had
> > plans to replace that sub_if_list with an RCU list and not require the
> > lock there, but that's far off. Any ideas how to fix this? We can't
> > reject the master stop so we have to walk the list, I guess we'll have
> > to audit the other list manipulation places, I think they're all under
> > RTNL.
> 
> Yeah I think they're all under RTNL too.  So you don't need to
> take the lock here at all since you should already have the RTNL.

I'll take a look at them and post appropriate patches.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] disable PCIE 'Enable No Snoop' bit by default
• Next by Date: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170
• Previous by thread: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170
• Next by thread: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]