Re: [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts with the host stack.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Steve Wise wrote:


Roland Dreier wrote:
 > > What's wrong with my suggestion of having the iwarp driver create an
 > > "iwX" interface to go with the normal "ethX" interface?  It seems
 > > simpler to me, and there's a somewhat similar precedent with how
 > > mac80211 devices create both wlan0 and wmaster0 interfaces.
 > >  - R.
 >  > It seemed much more painful for me to implement. :-)
> > I'll look into this, but I think for this to be done, the changes must
 > be in the cxgb3 driver, not the rdma driver, because the guts of the
 > netdev struct are all private to cxgb3.  Remember that this interface
 > needs to still do non TCP traffic (like ARP and UDP)...
 >  > Maybe you have something in mind here that I'm not thinking about?

No, I was just spouting off.


At least someone is looking at my patch. ;-)

But the whole "create a magic alias" seems kind of unfriendly to the
user.  Maybe as you said, the cxgb3 net driver could create the alias
for the iw_cxgb3 driver?

I agree that it is not very user friendly.

My current patch just utilizes the IP address alias logic in the IP stack. So when you do 'ifconfig ethxx:blah ipaddr up' it creates a struct in_ifaddr which contains a ptr to the real struct net_device that services this alias. However, from what I can tell, I cannot just create one of these without binding an address. So the driver cannot create the alias interface until it knows the ipaddr/netmask/etc. IE: if you say 'ifconfig ethxx:blah up' it fails... You must supply an address to get one of these created.

To have the cxgb3 driver create something like 'iw0', I think it would need to create a full net_device struct. This makes the change much more complex. But perhaps its the right thing to do...

Steve.


Also, I could defer registering the device with the rdma core until the alias interface is created by the user. Thus the T3 device wouldn't be available for use until the ethxx:iw interface is created.

And I could log a WARN or INFO message if the iw_cxgb3 module is loaded and no ethxx:iw alias exists. This would help clue in the user...

Steve.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux