Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> writes:
>> Actually (and I think it's the same in the USA), a copyrighted work
>> has an implicit "all rights reserved". A licence is just exception.
>
> And? The fact remains that "All Rights Reserved" means "I am reserving all
> rights I do not specifically grant or waive".
Sure.
That means you can't use a work without obtaining a licence first
(unless you are the copyright holder and don't need (can't have)
the licence).
I.e., as the author, you don't have to write those "copyright xxx"
and the work is still protected.
> ie: If a license doesn't
> state 'The licenser hereby waives the right to revoke this license at any
> time' then that right hasn't been lost.
Yes, it hasn't been *lost*. It just never existed :-)
(with exception of those things starting 40 or so years after the
original publication, I think we can safely skip this part).
Obviously, the copyright holder is free to distribute the work
under a different licence next time (but (s)he has to make sure it's
ok with licences (s)he uses, if it's a derived work).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
