* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems this didn't get merged? Latest git as of today still has the code > > as it was before this patch. > > This is must fix for .23 and Ingo previously mentioned that he will push it > for .23 yep, it's queued up and it will send it with the next batch. (this is the most important scheduler fix we have at the moment - there are 3 other, smaller items queued up as well) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- Prev by Date: Re: tbench regression - Why process scheduler has impact on tbench and why small per-cpu slab (SLUB) cache creates the scenario?
- Next by Date: Re: ramdisk
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
- Index(es):
 |