Re: building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken

Hi,

[Adding K{build,config} wizards to CC]

On 05/09/07, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>   i know sam ravnborg has been Cc'ed on a janitors list posting
> mentioning this but, just in case this note can get a fix snuck in
> there quickly before 2.6.23 (this is on i386, but i'm guessing applies
> to all arches):
>
> $ make distclean
> $ make defconfig
> $ make menuconfig      (select visor.ko to be built a module)
> $ make drivers/usb/serial/visor.ko
> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>   UPD     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-i386
>   CC      arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s
>   GEN     include/asm-i386/asm-offsets.h
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CC      scripts/mod/empty.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
>   MKELF   scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/file2alias.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/modpost.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/sumversion.o
>   HOSTLD  scripts/mod/modpost
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kallsyms
>   HOSTCC  scripts/conmakehash
>   HOSTCC  scripts/bin2c
>   CC [M]  drivers/usb/serial/visor.o
> /bin/sh: .tmp_versions/visor.mod: No such file or directory
>   MODPOST 0 modules
> $
>
>   whoops.  manually creating the directory .tmp_versions first fixes
> this, but i'm not conversant enough with the Makefile to want to take
> a shot at repairing this.
>
> rday
>
> --
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
> Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
> http://crashcourse.ca

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] detect & print stack overruns at oops time
• Next by Date: Rescanning SCSI/SATA bus
• Previous by thread: building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken
• Next by thread: Re: building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]