Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for
> > the above define?  (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-)
> 
> It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?

That is certainly the cleanest solution. Maybe we can only convert the 
variables used in the scheduler that way?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
    • From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add support for keyboard on SEGA Dreamcast
• Next by Date: Re: tbench regression - Why process scheduler has impact on tbench and why small per-cpu slab (SLUB) cache creates the scenario?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
• Next by thread: What's happening with the cpuidle code?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]