Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for
> > the above define?  (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-)
> 
> It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?

That is certainly the cleanest solution. Maybe we can only convert the 
variables used in the scheduler that way?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
  - From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add support for keyboard on SEGA Dreamcast
Next by Date: Re: tbench regression - Why process scheduler has impact on tbench and why small per-cpu slab (SLUB) cache creates the scenario?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
Next by thread: What's happening with the cpuidle code?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]