Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)

> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:11:31 -0700 Mike Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?
> 
> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them.  I don't have the capability
> of testing on the powerpc.  
> 
> And are you asking for just the changes to fix the build problem, or the whole
> set of the changes that were made for x86_64 and i386 in regards to converting
> NR_CPU arrays to per cpu data?

Well...  it'd be better to have all architectures doing the same thing.  If
that's impractical then we should at least implement suitable accessor
functions into the arch so that core code doesn't need to handle some
architectures one way and others the other way.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
  - From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
  - From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Send quota messages via netlink
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]