On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:23:37 PDT, David Schwartz said: > > > Wrong - I said "You can't complain about Person A doing X when > > you let Person > > B do X without complaint". > > Yes, I can. There is no inconsistency between acting in one case and failing > to act in another. We need not act in every possible case where we could act > to preserve our right to act in a particular case. You *do* however need to be aware that in some cases, public inactivity and/or statements that something will not be acted on may estoppel any future attempts to enforce something.
Attachment:
pgp5fi6QDLVA0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- References:
- RE: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
- RE: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23 0/2] cxgb3 - Fix dev->priv usage
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Massive net driver stats cleanup
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- Next by thread: Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
- Index(es):
 |