Re: [-mm PATCH] Memory controller improve user interface (v3)

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Paul Menage wrote:
> On 9/3/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paul Menage wrote:
>>> On 9/2/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> -       s += sprintf(s, "%lu\n", *val);
>>>> +       if (read_strategy)
>>>> +               s += read_strategy(*val, s);
>>>> +       else
>>>> +               s += sprintf(s, "%lu\n", *val);
>>> This would be better as %llu
>>>
>> Hi, Paul,
>>
>> This does not need fixing, since the other counters like failcnt are
>> still unsigned long
>>
> 
> But val is an unsigned long long*. So printing *val with %lu will
> break (at least a warning, and maybe corruption if you had other
> parameters) on 32-bit archs.
> 

Yeah... Hmm.. just wonder if all the counters should be unsigned long
long? failcnt is the only remaining unsigned long counter now.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/