Re: PATCH? fix SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED vs SIGCONT race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, I also thought about something like this, but tried to avoid because
> it adds some complications. OTOH, this is not the fast path.

I agree it's not real pleasing, and would be glad to find better ideas.

> I'll try to think a bit more about this, and update the patch according
> to your comments. Looks like we don't need to check SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT
> here, we are doing this later anyway.

I look forward to your next version.  


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux