Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)
I am impressed, thanks!
It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever
submitting patches against -mm. Otherwise, people might forget.
> So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel.
> But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable
> kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?
I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to
miss-out on. BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
