Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> but given the amount of changes currently 
> going into net/ I thought this might be interesting:
> 
> [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595)

> [15604.138807]  [<c038c612>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0
> [15604.139163]  [<c038c9bb>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1b/0x40
> [15604.139515]  [<f91cb3fb>] VNetBridgeStartPromisc+0x2b/0x50 [vmnet]

Not sure why this would be interesting. Clearly, dev_set_promiscuity is
called without the RTNL held while it should be. And see who the caller
is?

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
    • From: Christian Kujau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
• Next by Date: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
• Previous by thread: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
• Next by thread: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]