Re: [RFC + PATCH] signalfd simplification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Small problem: unless I missed something, signalfd_deliver() and sys_signalfd()
> should use wake_up_all(), not wake_up() which implies nr_exclusive == 1.
> 
> It is possible that we have multiple threads waiting on ->signalfd_wqh with
> the the different ->sigmask. In this case, the first woken thread can ignore
> the signal, we should wake up all of them.

Oops, sorry for noise. I forgot about WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE, we don't set it by
default.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux