On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:36:48 CDT, Rob Landley said: > Could you mention it in feature-removal-schedule.txt? (People check that for > warning of upcoming changes that impact existing code. They may not notice > something elsewhere after they've got it working...) > > (Also, sorting feature-removal-schedule.txt by date would be really nice. The > sucker's gotten huge...) Maybe it's time we actually start heaving stuff over the side, especially that stuff that the removal date has gone by? What: dev->power.power_state When: July 2007 What: Video4Linux API 1 ioctls and video_decoder.h from Video devices. When: December 2006 What: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_thread) When: August 2006 What: CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING When: June 2006 What: eepro100 network driver When: January 2007 5 out of 26 things - close to 20% - is already overdue for nuking. In some cases, over a year overdue.
Attachment:
pgp34RT6yAhbs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- References:
- [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- Prev by Date: Re: Nonblocking call may block in a mutex? Nonblocking call after poll may fail?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
- Index(es):
 |