On Aug 28 2007 21:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Umm, no way we're ever going to remove a syscall like this. Please
>> stop this deprecration crap. Just make sure no ones adds more binary
>> sysctls.
>
>I think it's worth a try. It might take two, three or five years, who
>knows? If it turns out to be impractical then we we can just change our
>minds later, no big loss. It's just too early to say right now.
Great, why do not we remove all the things marked obsolete and
start Linux 2.*newversionbeep*. Just rm, no add, and then tag.
If we never start moving to get rid of the old stuff, we will be
ending up where Microsoft is; though we won't get there as fast since
Linux was designed carefully in the first place and did/does not
collect as much compat dust.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
