On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:32:11PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > (If sysctlfs wasn't part of proc, that would be less of an issue, but we need > union mounts for that...) Not at all. all sysctls are under /proc/sys/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- References:
- [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- Prev by Date: Re: file system for solid state disks
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Documentation/arm/00-INDEX add missing entries.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
- Index(es):
 |