Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> Blackfin too please :) i think v850 also falls into this category, but 
> i'm not terribly familiar with it ...

Andrew, do you still strongly oppose to having ARCH_HAS_RANDOMIZE_BRK 
macro instead please?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: Franck Bui-Huu <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
    • From: "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] CIFS: ignore mode change if it's just for clearing setuid/setgid bits
• Next by Date: Re: hda: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]