On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Blackfin too please :) i think v850 also falls into this category, but > i'm not terribly familiar with it ... Andrew, do you still strongly oppose to having ARCH_HAS_RANDOMIZE_BRK macro instead please? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: Franck Bui-Huu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- References:
- [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- From: "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] CIFS: ignore mode change if it's just for clearing setuid/setgid bits
- Next by Date: Re: hda: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
- Index(es):
 |