Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is it actually necessary to change the license? With the dual-license, you can keep a single code-base for both BSD and Linux platforms, which seems terribly important to me. It'd be awful to lose that. It would be a maintenance nightmare for BSD. Is it even possible--in real life, I mean--to accept GPLed patches into a BSD project? Nightmare, I tell you!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux